![]() It isn't perfect (no model is), but I've found it gives a good sense of what the meta looks like at the top end and generally "feels correct" to folks. This approach was inspired by a pair of articles by Evan Miller: For each affix set, the site calculates the lower bound of a 95% confidence interval and uses that to create the tier list. For each dungeon, the site calculates the lower bound of a 95% confidence interval and uses that to create the tier list.įor affixes: We take the top 500 keys for each dungeon for each region per affix. The site then averages these lower bounds, one per dungeon, to get an overall average lower bound for each spec, which the site then uses to create the tier list.įor dungeons: We take the top 500 keys per dungeon for each region for a given affix. From these, for each dungeon, for each spec, the site takes the lower bound of a 95% confidence interval of the top 500 runs for each spec. Here's the site calculates it:įor specs: The site looks at the top 100 500 keys per dungeon per affix across all region and examine their raider.io scores. Lb_ci stands for the lower bound of a 95% confidence interval. What's the lb_ci mean under detailed statistical analysis? S-Tier is better than A-Tier which is better than B, which is better than C, and so on. For specs, that means that spec is stronger. For dungeons, that means that dungeon is easier compared to others. ![]() Frequently Asked Questions What do the tier lists mean?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |